Issue Ownership and Framing: Comparing the Scottish Political Parties on Social Media

Cara McLaughlin

doi:10.22151/politikon.57.2

Authors

Cara McLaughlin University of Glasgow https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9328-6097

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.57.2

Keywords:

Issue Ownership, Framing, Social Media, Scottish Politics, Elections, Political Communication

Abstract

This article explores how Scottish political parties frame their owned issues on social media to persuade voters during the run-up to elections. Through a qualitative analysis of 150 Twitter and Facebook posts from five major Scottish parties, the study reveals that parties employ threat and victim framing to bolster their vote share. Opposition parties predominantly portray the Scottish National Party (SNP) as a threat, while all parties frame the electorate as victims. The extent and focus of these frames vary based on parties' parliamentary strength and government/opposition status. The SNP, holding a strong governing position, focuses on advancing its independence agenda, while other parties critique the SNP and then promote their own priorities. This article contributes to framing theory by highlighting the nuanced relationship between issue ownership, threat, and victim frames in shaping electoral outcomes. The findings underscore the strategic use of social media by parties to influence voter perceptions and decisions.

References

Andersson, Hanna S. 2022. “Normalized in the public sphere.” Master thesis. Stockholm University, Sweden, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1669593/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Australian Greens. 2022. “Powering Past Coal and Gas,” https://greens.org.au/sites/default/files/2022-04/Greens-2022-Plan--Powering-Past-Coal-and-Gas.pdf.

Arowolo, Olasunkanmi. 2017. “Understanding Framing Theory.” https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25800.52482.

Bartholome, Guus, Sophie Lecheler and Claes de Vreese. 2018. “Towards A Typology of Conflict Frames.” Journalism Studies 19, no. 12: 1689-1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1299033.

Belanger, Éric. and Bonnie M. Meguid. 2008. “Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice.” Electoral Studies 27, no. 3: 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001.

Blomqvist, Paula. and Christoffer Green-Pedersen. 2004. “Defeat at Home? Issue-Ownership and Social Democratic Support in Scandinavia.” Government and Opposition 39, no. 4: 587-613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00137.x.

Boydstun, Amber E., Justin H. Gross, Philip Resnik and Noah A. Smith. 2013. “Identifying Media Frames and Frame Dynamics Within and Across Policy Issues.” Faculty Washington Edu. https://faculty.washington.edu/jwilker/559/frames-2013.pdf.

Elias, Anwen, and Núria Franco-Guillén. 2021. “Justifying Secession in Catalonia: Resolving Grievances or a Means to a Better Future?.” Politics and Governance 9, no. 4: 453-464. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4561.

Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 4: 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.

Erikson, Johan. 2020. “Threat Framing.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1647.

Fagan, EJ. 2019. “Issue ownership and the priorities of party elites in the United States, 2004–2016.” Party Politics 27, no. 1: 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819839212.

Fairhurst, Gail T. 2005. “Reframing The Art of Framing: Problems and Prospects for Leadership.” Leadership 1, no. 2: 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005051857.

Foley, K., P. Ward and D. McNaughton 2019. “Innovating Qualitative Framing Analysis for Purposes of Media Analysis Within Public Health Inquiry.” Qualitative Health Research 29, no. 12: 1810-1822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319826559.

Graham, Todd and Julia Schwanholz. 2020. Politicians and political parties’ use of social media in-between elections.” Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 9, no. 2: 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00017_1.

Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Rune Stubager. 2010. “The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When Do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention?.” British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3: 663-677. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40930604.

Guggenheim, Lauren., Mo S. Jang, Soo Young Bae, and Russell W. Neuman. 2015. The Dynamics of Issue Frame Competition in Traditional and Social Media.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659, no. 1: 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215570549.

Hallahan, Kirk. 1999. “Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research 11, no. 3: 205-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02.

Hameleers, Michael, Linda Bos and Claes de Vreese. 2017. “Framing blame: toward a better understanding of the effects of populist communication on populist party preferences.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28, no. 3: 380-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1407326.

Heidenreich, Tobias, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Fabienne Lind, and Hajo Boomgaarden. 2020. Political migration discourses on social media: a comparative perspective on visibility and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46, no. 7: 1261-1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1665990.

Helbling, Marc. 2014. “Framing Immigration in Western Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40, no. 1: 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.830888.

Kalsnes, Bente. 2016. “The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice.” Social Media + Society 2, no. 2: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116644616.

Labour. 2022. “Labour’s Legacy – The Labour Party.” Accessed 27 June, 2022. https://labour.org.uk/about/labours-legacy/.

Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee., Heldman, Caroline, and Babbitt, Paul. 1999. “The Effects of Negative Political Advertisements: A Meta-Analytic Assessment.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 4: 851-875. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586117.

Levin, Irwin P., Schneider, Sandra L., and Gaeth, Gary J. 1998. “All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76, no. 2: 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804.

Levine, M. and Arkin, J. 2019. “Republicans support Trump's wall even after he grabs military funds from their states.” POLITICO. Accessed May 5, 2022. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/11/republicans-border-wall-military-funding-1488818.

Liberal Democrats. 2022. “Our Constitution.” Accessed 27 June, 2022. https://www.libdems.org.uk/constitution.

Linstrom, Maragret. and Marais, Willemien. 2012. “Qualitative News Frame Analysis: A Methodology.” Communitas 17: 21-38. https://doi.org/10.38140/com.v17i0.991.

Olsen, Asmus., 2020. “Equivalency Framing in Political Decision Making.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1249.

Parry, Nick. 2017. “Merkel's strong stance on climate change is uncontroversial in Germany.” Election Watch. Accessed May 24, 2022. https://electionwatch.unimelb.edu.au/articles/merkels-strong-stance-on-climate-change-is-uncontroversial-in-germany.

Patterson, James, Carina Wyborn, Linda Westman, Marie Claire Brisbois, Manjana Milkoreit, and Dhanasree Jayaram. 2021. “The political effects of emergency frames in sustainability.” Nature Sustainability 4, no. 10: 841-850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00749-9.

Prim, Sara. 2015. “Party Review: The Catalan Socialist Party (PSC) is against Catalonia’s independence and declares that ‘a nation is not a state’.” Catalan News, Accessed 11 May, 2022. https: //www.catalannews.com/politics/item/party-review-catalan-socialist-party-psc-is-against-catalonia-s-independence-and-declares-that-a-nation-is-not-a-state.

Ramos-Serrano, Marina, Jorge D. Fernández Gómez and Antonio Pineda. 2018. “’Follow the closing of the campaign on streaming’: The use of Twitter by Spanish political parties during the 2014 European elections.” New Media & Society 20, no. 1: 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660730.

Scottish Parliament. 2022. “Current party balance.” Accessed 20 June 2022. https: //www.parliament.scot/msps/current-party-balance.

Seeberg, Henrik B. 2017. “How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis.” Political Studies 65, no. 2: 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224.

Shesterinina, Anastasia. 2016. “Collective Threat Framing and Mobilization in Civil War.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 3: 411–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000277.

SNP. 2022. “Constitution—Scottish National Party.” Accessed 27 June, 2022. https://www.snp.org/our-vision/constitution/.

Stuckelberger, Simon. 2021. “Mobilizing and chasing: The voter targeting of negative campaigning – lessons from the Swiss case.” Party Politics 27, no. 2: 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819852252.

UK Green Party. 2017. “Green Party Manifesto.” Accessed 24 May, 2022. https: //www.greenparty.org.uk/assets/files/green-party-environment-manifesto.pdf.

Valenzuela, Sebastián, Martina Piña, and Josefina Ramírez. 2017. “Behavioral Effects of Framing on Social Media Users: How Conflict, Economic, Human Interest, and Morality Frames Drive News Sharing.” Journal of Communication 67, no. 5: 803–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12325.

van der Goot, Emma., Sanne Kruikemeier, Jeroen de Ridder and Rens Vliegenthart. 2022. “Online and Offline Battles: Usage of Different Political Conflict Frames.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 29, no. 1: 26-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161222109663.

Varacheva, Tatiana. and Sergiu Gherghina. 2018. “Neutral or Biased? The Presentation of the Kyrgyzstan and Egypt Uprisings by RIA Novosti.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 8: 1213-1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1508644.

Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia and Sofie Van Bauwel. 2014. “YouTube: A Political Advertising Tool? A Case Study of the Use of YouTube in the Campaign for the European Parliament Elections 2009.” Journal of Political Marketing 13, no. 3: 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.929886.

Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere and Michiel Nuytemans. 2009. “Issue Ownership Stability and Change: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues Through Media Appearances.” Political Communication 26, no. 2: 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902850718.

Walgrave, Stefan., Julie Sevenans, Kirsten Van Camp and Peter Loewen. 2018. “What Draws Politicians’ Attention? An Experimental Study of Issue Framing and its Effect on Individual Political Elites.” Political Behavior 40, no. 3: pp.547-569. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48694138.

Zhou, Jack. 2016. “Boomerangs versus Javelins: How Polarization Constrains Communication on Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 25, no. 5: 788-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1166602.