Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
IAPSS Politikon is committed to the principle of double-blind peer review, ensuring author and reviewer anonymity and minimizing bias in the evaluation process.
Serving as a reviewer for IAPSS Politikon is a valuable academic contribution that helps uphold high standards in Political Science publishing. Reviewers engage with new research while contributing professionally to the scholarly community.
To become a reviewer, please complete the application form.
Once you are accepted into the reviewer database, Editorial Board members will contact you with review requests for manuscripts in your area of specialization. The timing of your first request will depend on the topics of submitted manuscripts.
To be removed from the reviewer database, please email politikonjournal@iapss.org.
Please complete the reviewer report form sent with the review request and return it by email. The form includes an assessment checklist, a recommendation, comments to the author, and an optional section for confidential comments to the editor. Use the comments section to explain your evaluation and to discuss the manuscript's strengths, weaknesses, and compliance with the submission guidelines.
You may also insert comments directly into the manuscript file using the comments or track changes function in your word processor, and return it with the completed form. The form itself is still required.
Treat the manuscript as confidential. Do not upload the manuscript, or any part of it, to generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, as this breaches confidentiality and the authors' rights. The review report, including the comments to the author, must be written by you. If you recognize the work or its authors, please inform the editor.
On Windows:
On Mac:
These steps help maintain reviewer anonymity in the double-blind review process.
A strong review identifies the manuscript's weaknesses and offers constructive suggestions for improvement. If a manuscript shows promise but needs work, detailed and specific feedback can help the author bring it to publication quality.
In the review form, please select one of the following recommendations:
Once the process is complete, reviewers may request the anonymized comments of other reviewers for comparison. Your own anonymized review may also be shared with others involved in the review of the same manuscript.
You may be invited to review a revised version of a manuscript you previously evaluated. The review form asks whether you are willing to do so; you are free to accept or decline without any effect on your reviewer status.
We sincerely appreciate your time and contribution to the peer review process. Your thoughtful feedback is vital to maintaining the standards of IAPSS Politikon.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.