Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
This issue examines sovereignty, colonial legacies and identity across global, national and local politics. Lala Jafarova analyzes how the proposed WHO pandemic treaty balances national sovereignty against global public health. Judy El Baba traces how the colonial legacies of the French Mandate continue to shape Lebanon’s sectarian institutions. In a research note, Catalina Catana and Simen Ekeberg offer a decolonial critique of international law through the lens of Israel’s war on Gaza. In another, Sung Jun Han argues that democracy is better served by fostering multiple, distinct social identities than by making identities more flexible.
In the Conversations section, Stephanie Mae Pedron makes the case for extending voting rights to non-citizens in the United States, and Abel Polese offers practical advice to scholars from the Global South on the barriers they face in academic publishing. Two book reviews close the issue. Georgy Slavin-Rudakov reviews Julie A. Cassiday’s Russian Style, and Maria Tarasenko reviews Leta Hong Fincher’s Betraying Big Brother.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.