Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
As the United Nations turns 80, this issue asks how far governance has drifted from the ideals that once guided it. Abigail Georgison revisits a critique of the UN security framework first published in IAPSS Politikon in 2007. Drawing on the intervention in Libya, she finds that the Responsibility to Protect has become more a commitment than an enforceable mechanism. The gap between principle and practice reappears in Mohammad Amaan Siddiqui’s comparison of the United States and India, where the power to name “terrorism” and “resistance” decides who is heard and who is criminalized.
The same tension shapes the issue’s studies of reform. Lloyd George Banda, Kelvin Ryna Chilala, Innocent Kazembe Chirwa and Emmanuel George Yusufu find that access to information laws have done little to curb corruption in Malawi without strong institutions behind them. Greta Comedini shows how the Eurozone crisis brought technocratic governments to power and asks what democracy loses when expertise takes over. Gavin Faulkner’s review of Sean Coyle’s Natural Law and Modern Society closes the issue.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.