Expanding the UN’s Collective Security System

Do the Responsibility to Protect and the Duty to Prevent Conform to its Ideal Elements?

Authors

  • Andrea Charron Royal Military College of Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.13.1.3

Keywords:

United Nations, UN doctrines, collective security, international relations

Abstract

The United Nations’ 60th anniversary has prompted discussion and debate as to how best to improve this weakened organization. These discussions have included the adoption of two new doctrines to the existing collective security system. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Duty to Prevent, however, are not necessarily compatible with the ideals of the system as envisioned by the framers of the Charter. In striving to improve the legitimacy of the organization, the R2P and most certainly, the Duty to Prevent may undermine the very organization they seek to strengthen.

Downloads

Published

2007-04-30

How to Cite

Charron, Andrea. 2007. “Expanding the UN’s Collective Security System: Do the Responsibility to Protect and the Duty to Prevent Conform to Its Ideal Elements?”. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 8 (1). Online:33-52. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.13.1.3.

Issue

Section

Research articles