Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
This issue marks twenty years since the first issue of IAPSS Politikon. The editorial looks back on the journal’s development into a journal for scholars at all career stages, reports on a year of editorial work, and announces the 2021 IAPSS Politikon Best Article Award.
Three research articles follow. Carol-Ann Rouillard and Mireille Lalancette analyze how the media covered gender parity in Canada’s federal and provincial cabinets. Esther Ng K.H. argues that a fuller account of practice and reflexivity allows ontological security to explain change in International Relations. Oxana Pimenova shows how the subsidiarity principle can serve as a tool for dialogue between EU institutions and national parliaments.
Two research notes complete the issue. Fernando Ursine Braga Silva traces the breakup of the Democratic Party of Japan and the realignment of the opposition. Paul Fricker examines how rivalry between the United States and China in Djibouti affects counterterrorism operations.
The issue was originally published as Volume 49 (June 2021). It was renumbered in October 2026 under the journal’s year-based numbering. Its DOIs are unchanged.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.