Accounting for Change in IR

The Application of Ontological Security Considerations to IR Theory

Authors

  • Esther Ng K.H. National University of Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.49.2

Keywords:

Change, Constructivism, International Relations Theory, Ontological Security, Practice, Social Theory

Abstract

Most theories of International Relations (IR) are cautious, if not pessimistic, about the potential for change in IR. In this regard, the concept of ontological security holds promising yet oft-overlooked prospects. This article argues that applications of ontological security to IR theory thus far have been limited due to the narrow conceptualisations of practices and how they contribute to one’s attempts to preserve their ontological security. As such, this paper seeks to expand the theoretical framework through which ontological security is applied to IR, which involves a more comprehensive conceptualisation of practice that considers reflexivity as key. Accordingly, the theory demonstrates that a state, faced with threats to their sense of Self, can respond either by rigidising or changing their practices rather than being limited to the former. This allows one to account for change—especially big change—in world politics such as the increasingly inward-looking turn of the West.

Author Biography

Esther Ng K.H., National University of Singapore

Esther Ng graduated from the National University of Singapore with her Bachelor’s Degree in political science and philosophy in 2021. She will be pursuing her graduate studies at the University of Chicago come fall. Esther’s ongoing research projects revolve around the role of wisdom in politics as well as the relationship between truth and democracy. Her research interests include political epistemology, wisdom, and contemporary political theory.

References

Anandhika, Rizqy. 2017. “Protectionism Thrives in the West: Is the Pendulum of Globalisation Swinging to the East?“ ERIA. 2017. https://www.eria.org/news-and-views/protectionism-thrives-in-the-west-is-the-pendulum-of-globalisation-swinging-to-the-east/.

Browning, Christopher S., and Pertti Joenniemi. 2017. “Ontological Security, Self-Articulation and the Securitization of Identity.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653161.

Flockhart, Trine. 2016. “The Problem of Change in Constructivist Theory: Ontological Security Seeking and Agent Motivation.” Review of International Studies 42 (5): 799-820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051600019X.

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2019. “The Failure of Europe's Mainstream Parties.” Journal of Democracy 30 (4): 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0067.

Homolar, Alexandra, and Ronny Scholz. 2019. “The Power of Trump-Speak: Populist Crisis Narratives and Ontological Security.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 344-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1575796.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (1): 171-200. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171.

———. 2018. “Change in International Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (3): 687-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117718041.

Lupovici, Amir. 2012. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel's Unilateral Steps towards the Palestinians.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 809-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000222.

MacKay, Joseph. 2016. “The Nomadic Other: Ontological Security and the Inner Asian Steppe in Historical East Asian International Politics.” Review of International Studies 42 (3): 471-91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000327.

Mälksoo, Maria. 2019. “The Normative Threat of Subtle Subversion: The Return of 'Eastern Europe' as an Ontological Insecurity Trope.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 365-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1590314.

Mehta, Suketu. 2019. “Immigration Panic: How the West Fell for Manufactured Rage.” The Guardian. 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/27/immigration-panic-how-the-west-fell-for-manufactured-rage.

Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346.

Pramuk, Jacob. 2019. “It’s Not Just China: Trump's Trade War Is Raging on Several Fronts.” CNBC. 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/trump-carries-out-tariff-trade-wars-with-china-eu-canada-and-mexico.html.

Rossdale, Chris. 2015. “Enclosing Critique: The Limits of Ontological Security.” International Political Sociology 9 (4): 369-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12103.

Scott, Robert E. 2020. “We Can Reshore Manufacturing Jobs, but Trump Hasn’t Done It.” EPI Policy Center. 2020. https://www.epi.org/publication/reshoring-manufacturing-jobs/.

Sink, Justin, Shelly Banjo, and Olivia Carville. 2020. “Trump Orders Freeze on Many Work Visas Through End of Year.” Bloomberg. 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-22/trump-to-order-freeze-on-some-work-visas-through-end-of-year.

Steele, Brent J., and Alexandra Homolar. 2019. “Ontological Insecurities and the Politics of Contemporary Populism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 214-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1596612.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ng K.H., E. (2021). Accounting for Change in IR: The Application of Ontological Security Considerations to IR Theory. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science, 49, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.49.2

Issue

Section

Articles