Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
This issue brings together four research articles on legitimacy, information and the health of democratic institutions. Yusuke Ishikawa draws on an interview with a former head of Transparency International UK. He shows that the organization acted as a think tank, shaping both the drafting and the early implementation of the UK Bribery Act 2010. Andrei Dălălău analyzes four political myths that Romanian presidential candidates used to build legitimacy in the early 1990s, after the fall of communism.
Jinwook Lee develops a framework for how negative information on social media distorts political judgment. He tests it on tweets from the Internet Research Agency and finds that negative and anger-inducing content drew more interaction. Francesco Maria Scanni asks whether populists in government merely erode liberal institutions or threaten constitutional democracy itself.
The issue was originally published as Volume 51 (December 2021). It was renumbered in October 2026 under the journal’s year-based numbering. Its DOIs are unchanged.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.