Correction: volume and issue numbering, 2023–2026
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
This issue asks how power works in places where it is easy to overlook. Elizabeth Wright moves beyond Orwell’s Big Brother to trace the expansion of domestic surveillance in the post-9/11 United States, and warns that the national security state carries authoritarian tendencies. Shayna Servillas draws on Robert Putnam’s two-level game to show that even powerful domestic actors in foreign policy are bounded by international constraints. Frederik Gremler uses multilevel modelling to explore the link between the rule of law and generalized trust.
The issue then turns to contested public debates and protest. Johannes Carl Busse examines the heated German debate on shared parenting, where the line between science and advocacy has become hard to draw. Helal Mohammed Khan revisits the 2013 Hefazat-e-Islam protests in Bangladesh through Gramsci, Scott and Mandela to ask what they teach about counter-hegemonic mobilization.
Volume numbers of IAPSS Politikon now correspond to the year of publication. The issues published between 2023 and 2026 have been relabelled, and their PDFs reissued. All DOIs are unchanged.
On 11 May 2026 (10:00 GMT+1, London), Domenico Andrea Schiuma, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Milan, will present a seminar on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). The talk traces the history and foundations of this method, developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 as a way to bridge the longstanding divide between qualitative and quantitative research traditions. Drawing on his own experience using QCA in comparative political research, Schiuma will explain how the method works and what makes it distinctive among mixed-methods approaches.
How are world leaders responding to the United States’ changing diplomatic posture? As Washington adopts a more transactional approach to alliances and engages more openly with authoritarian governments, political leaders across democratic and non-democratic systems face difficult choices. Some accommodate the shift, others resist it, and many attempt to navigate the tension between strategic partnership and the defence of democratic norms.
The Conversations section invites short analytical contributions that place political leadership at the centre of this debate. We welcome essays and reflections examining how individual leaders’ personalities, strategic visions, and domestic constraints shape their responses to an increasingly authoritarian-leaning U.S. foreign policy. Submissions (500–1,000 words) are due 15 April 2026.