Defense and Counter-Terrorism in Israel

The Misappropriation of Deterrence

Authors

  • Michael Joshua Fleet Memorial University of Newfoundland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.26.5

Keywords:

counter-terrorism, deterrence, integration, Israel, reconciliation, terrorism

Abstract

This paper is an analysis of the research question “is the Israeli defence policy of deterrence effective in minimizing domestic-terrorism?” Through a two-part examination of deterrence and then reconciliation, it explains that Israel has adopted an anachronistic geo-political view of the issues in West Bank/Gaza that must be updated to one of domestic counter-terrorism. The author argues that a reconciliation process would be a more effective method of countering domestic terrorism in Israel as it, if done correctly, can address the deeply-entrenched grievances felt by the groups involved with the conflict.

Author Biography

Michael Joshua Fleet, Memorial University of Newfoundland

Michael Joshua Fleet, 20, from Paradise (NL, Canada), is a third-year undergraduate student completing a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Political Science with a second major in German at Memorial University of Newfoundland. His interests include peacebuilding, identity politics, peace and security studies, democratic transition, and post-conflict research.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-31

How to Cite

Fleet, Michael Joshua. 2015. “Defense and Counter-Terrorism in Israel: The Misappropriation of Deterrence”. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 26 (March). Online:66-83. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.26.5.

Issue

Section

Research articles