Borders to Borderless
An Analysis of the Social Construction of the US Securitization Agenda (2006-2010)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.29.14Keywords:
security studies, National Security Strategy, US securitisation, 9/11 attacks, Iraq invasion, cybersecurity, social constructivism, technological determinismAbstract
This study explores the relative contributions of state rhetoric, the public sphere and corporate elite interests towards the construction of the 2010 US National Security Strategy (NSS). Interpreted thusly, the evolution in the US securitisation agenda illustrates the social construction of US securitisation strategy as a national artefact seemingly informed by local interests but framed within international uncertainty. Exploring the relative contributions of state rhetoric, the public sphere and corporate elite interests thusly, indicates that different threat matrixes emerge from the social forces that propel the 2010 NSS into being. The research, in accordance with its approach, finds that the focus of securing the threat of risk to national interests and assets within international uncertainty, results in the form of US securitisation strategy not fully realising its function of securitisation. Through deliberating on how and why particular threats are prioritised above others to the nation-state, this article seeks to motivate further research into the social construction of policy priorities to better understand how and why threat matrixes shift in the 21st Century.