De Facto Sovereignty and Population Displacement as Tools of Conflict

Authors

  • Hilmi Ulas George Mason University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.29.17

Keywords:

sovereignty, population displacement, Russia, China

Abstract

Two largely debated questions in the realm of international relations are the roles of post-Cold War Russia and China within the current global context. However, the debates in the literature fails to take into account the fact that both superpowers employ the same tactic: the asymmetrical conquest of new territory as promoted by historical claims, retroactively justified through population displacement. Subsequently, debates on the topic mistakenly focus on elite motivations rather than what can be controlled: the responses of the international community to the abovementioned tactics. I will document why mainly Russia but also China have opted to use the tactic of territorial conquest and demonstrate how the international community has tacitly promoted the use of this tactic. I will ultimately argue that there is a need to create international standards for sovereignty and that a move from inactive conflict avoidance to active conflict resolution is necessary.

Author Biography

Hilmi Ulas, George Mason University

Hilmi Ulas, 27, from Nicosia (Cyprus), is a PhD Candidate at the School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University in Virginia, USA, where he previously obtained his MS in Conflict Analysis and Resolution. He obtained his BA in Political Science in Grinnell College, Iowa, USA where his thesis entitled “The Devil’s Triangle in the Mediterranean?” evaluated the possibility of a peace agreement in the Cypriot Conflict. He currently works at George Mason University – where he has taught for the last two years – as a Graduate Research Assistant. His interests are in peacebuilding, conflict resolution, comparative politics, international law and policymaking, and international security studies. His dissertation work focuses on evaluating the impact of unrecognition of a state on the conflict and conflict resolution processes where the said state is involved.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Ulas, Hilmi. 2016. “De Facto Sovereignty and Population Displacement As Tools of Conflict”. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 29 (March). Online:280-94. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.29.17.

Issue

Section

Research articles