Energy Crisis Revolution?
The Impact of the Solidarity Contribution on the Evolution of EU Fiscal Powers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.61.2Keywords:
Energy Governance, Energy Crisis, Fiscal Governance, Fiscal Capacity, Fiscal Regulation, Fiscal Integration, Next Generation EU, Recovery and Resilience Fund, Solidarity Contribution, Historical InstitutionalismAbstract
Since 2021, the EU has been threatened by an energy crisis, causing a dramatic rise in energy prices and the inflation rate. Among the measures adopted by the EU in response is Regulation 1854/2022, introducing a solidarity contribution to be levied on the surplus profits of companies in the energy market. Through the lens of historical institutionalism, this paper analyzes the solidarity contribution to understand what kind of institutional change, if any, it represents for EU fiscal integration. The paper finds that, rather than a revolution, the adoption of the solidarity contribution reflects path-dependence. That is, with the adoption of Regulation 1854/2022, the EU has maintained a fiscal regulatory approach to the energy sector that does not substantially depart from previous fiscal governance modes.
References
Antón, Ricardo García. 2023. “The EU Legitimacy to Enact Direct Taxes.” In The Power to Tax in Europe, by Johan Lindholm and Anders Hultqvist, 19-36. Hart Publishing.
Broschek, Jörg. 2013. «Between path dependence and gradual change: Historical institutionalism and the study of federal dynamics.» In Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism, by Arthur Benz and Jörg Broschek, 93-116. Oxford University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199652990.003.0005
Buti, Marco, and Sergio Fabbrini. 2023. "The Political Determinants of Fiscal Governance in the EU: Towards a New Equilibrium." Politics and Governance. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7248
Capati, Andrea. 2024. ‘The COVID-19 Pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF).” Journal of European Integration 46 (3): 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2294722
Capati, Andrea. 2023. “The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Establishment of the Recovery and Resilience Facility: A ‘Critical Junctures’ Analysis of the European Union’s Financial Assistance Regime.” POLITIKON: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science 55: 19-43. https://doi.org/10.22151/politikon.55.2.
Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. 2007. "THE STUDY OF CRITICAL JUNCTURES: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism." World Politics, April: 341-369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852
Christiansen, Thomas, Amy Verdun. 2020. “Historical institutionalism in the study of European integration.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.178
Crowe, Richard. 2020. “An EU budget of states and citizens.” European Law Journal 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12398
EIB, European Investment Bank. 2022. How bad is the Ukraine war for the European recovery?. https://www.eib.org/files/publications/how_bad_is_the_ukraine_war_for_the_european_recovery_en.pdf.
https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Brief_2_Energy%20Crisis.pdf.
Eurostat. 2023a. Inflation in the euro area. December. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Inflation_in_the_euro_area.
Eurostat. 2023b. EU energy mix and import dependency. May 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:EU_energy_mix_and_import_dependency
Fabbrini, Sergio, and Andrea Capati. 2023. “Adjustments in economic crises: the different outcome of the sovereign debt and pandemic crises in Europe.” In The Cambridge Handbook on European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration, by D. Adamski, F. Amtenbrink and J. De Haan, 363-376. Cambridge University Press.
Genschel Philipp and Markus Jachtenfuchs. 2013. Beyond the Regulatory Polity?: The European Integration of Core State Powers. OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662821.001.0001
Global Witness. 2023. Crisis year 2022 brought $134 billion in excess profit to the West’s five largest oil and gas companies. 9 February. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/fossil-gas/crisis-year-2022-brought-134-billion-in-excess-profit-to-the-wests-five-largest-oil-and-gas-companies/ .
Hogan, John. 2006. “Remoulding the Critical Junctures Approach.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 657-679. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423906060203
Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, by Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, 19-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindholm, Johan. 2023. “Squaring the Constitutional Circle: An Overview of EU Fiscal Powers.” In The power to tax in Europe, by Johan Lindholm and Anders Hultqvist, 3-17. HART Publishing.
Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 1-37. Cambridge University Press.
Popkostova, Yana. 2022. “Europe’s energy crisis conundrum: Origins, impacts and way foreward.” European Union Institute for Security Studies.
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” The American Political Science Review, June: 251-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
Rónai, Orsolya. 2012. “The Energy Taxation Regime in the EU.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law 37. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Orsolya-Ronai/publication/258963345_The_Energy_Taxation_Regime_in_the_EU/links/0c96052985c398d7a1000000/The-Energy-Taxation-Regime-in-the-EU.pdf
Sanders, Elizabeth. 2006. “Historical Institutionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, by R.A.W Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman, 39-55.
Schramm, Lucas, and Chiara Terranova. 2024. “From NGEU to REPowerEU: policy steering and budgetary innovation in the EU.” Journal of European Integration 46 (6): 943-961. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2353791
Sgaravatti, Giovanni, Simone Tagliapietra, Cecilia Trasi, and Georg Zachmann. 2023. National fiscal policy responses to the energy crisis. 23 June. https://www.bruegel.org/dataset/national-policies-shield-consumers-rising-energy-prices.
Trouvé, Hélène, Yves Couturier, Francis Etheridge, Olivier Saint-Jean, and Dominique Somme. 2010. “The path dependency theory: analytical framework to study institutional integration. The case of France.” International Journal of Integrated Care, 30 June. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.544
Woźniakowski, Tomasz P, Tiziano Zgaga, and Sergio Fabbrini. 2023. “Comparative Fiscal Federalism and the Post‐Covid EU: Between Debt Rules and Borrowing Power.” Politics and Governance, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i4.7653
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
